Project allocation flags

Full line-item review queue

The full queue contains 17,875 review rows: all 14,806 project records and review signals from the Flags overview, the deeper DPWH HGAB screens, and 749 active FMR connectivity records. Matching Flags signals are joined into detailed rows; records outside the DPWH screen and FMRs are included as additional line items. The first 10 appear in the chart; the paginated table and exports cover the full queue. Signal counts come from different methods and are not a shared severity score. Flags are prompts to inspect evidence, not findings of wrongdoing.

Icon key: 📐 short range · 📈 relative rate · 🛣️ recorded condition · 🛞 recent surfacing · 🧩 NEP match review · 📂 listed documents · 🧮 POW · 📷 geotagged photos · 🏛️ RDC · 🪙 repeated amount · 🕰️ historical title · 📍 chainage overlap · 🧭 Flags overview signal · 🌾 FMR connectivity flag · 🚩 FMR double flag · 🔎 FMR distance review

How the ranking is calculated

1. Potential insertion: the current matcher identifies no plausible NEP counterpart; ambiguous links and FAPs are excluded.
2. No listed documents: no matched DPWH Transparency entry with listed documents exists in the current snapshot. This is independent of NEP counterpart status; documents may exist elsewhere.
3. Incomplete documentation: each absent POW, geotagged-photo or RDC type earns one point only when that project attachment list was locally inspected. No type is inferred missing for uninspected projects.
4. Repeated allocation amount: the same exact positive amount occurs in the same PAP at least 10 times across at least 3 named implementing offices. Roundness alone adds no point.
5. Historical title recurrence: an FY2016–FY2018 title-classified DPWH GAA baseline or FY2020–FY2026 DPWH GAA title agrees after case/punctuation normalization and removal of complete trailing station/coordinate metadata, with qualified municipality and province agreement. FY2016–FY2018 use a separate title-classified DPWH project-family baseline; FY2020–FY2025 use ODV annual GAA data; FY2026 uses the DPWH Details Enrolled Copy. Work descriptions, directions, packages and phases remain; conflicting locations/tranches and disjoint chainages are excluded.
6. Historical chainage overlap: an accepted historical counterpart has explicit, positive-length overlap. This is a scope indicator, not proof of duplicate paid work.
7. Very short range: a recovered printed project length under 10 meters earns a review flag. Verify notation and funded extent; it does not establish an unreasonable allocation.

Each qualifying type contributes one point, up to twelve possible types. Multiple historical years do not increase points. Historical recurrence and chainage overlap are related signals, so the count is not a statistical probability or independent-evidence score. Missing historical links can reflect conservative matching, incomplete coverage or unresolved names. Standard packages and legitimate amendments can produce these signals. Amounts overlap other findings; do not add them as alleged losses. Names, roles and party affiliations add no points. The complete review queue is also available as full ranking JSON.

Condition and prior-surfacing flags

One point for rehabilitation/reconstruction/major repair when the full matched road range was assessed Good/Fair in a known pre-budget year. One point for pavement work when the full matched range has a positive recorded last-surfacing year within five budget years. Widening, approaches, slope/drainage and off-carriageway scope are excluded. Unknowns and partial coverage add no point. The five-year window is a screening choice, not an engineering service-life standard. Bridge Good/Fair context without an assessment date remains a review lead and earns no dated-condition point. Later deterioration or different funded components may justify the work. Condition, recent surfacing and historical recurrence can be related; points are not independent evidence or probabilities.

Cost-per-meter and short-range flags

One point when allocation per stated meter exceeds both twice the peer median and Q3 + 1.5 × IQR. Peers share the work category, structure group, matched surface/condition/assessment-year context, exact official PAP and a data-derived length band, with at least 20 records whose stated lengths are at least 10 meters. No fixed 100-meter cutoff is used. Separately, a recovered printed length under 10 meters earns a denominator-warning point; verify the notation and funded extent. Extreme rates remain in this review table with a caution but are excluded from rate charts. Missing lengths and insufficient peers add no point. These flags do not establish overpricing: width, terrain, structures, quantities and funded extent remain unverified. See full rate and grouping methodology.