HGAB projects without DPWH Transparency links

Disclaimer. This site is updated as additional source documents are ingested and reviewed. Its records and calculations are preliminary and open to correction. Additional documents, stakeholder input, and independent review can surface missing information, errors, or context and improve accuracy over time; they may support more complete calculations but do not by themselves verify a record. Inviting people to examine the underlying sources and share corrections is part of the purpose of this work. These are preliminary, document-based observations, not allegations or findings that any person, office, contractor or other entity acted unlawfully. A flag, unmatched record, repeated amount or title, price or location outlier, or missing document is a prompt for review; it does not establish intent, responsibility, benefit, overpayment, duplicate scope or wrongdoing. Names and geographic or district associations indicate possible coverage only, not sponsorship, authorship, control, receipt or personal involvement. Source documents, data completeness, parsing, matching, categories, timing and boundaries may affect results. Verify cited primary records and seek relevant context before drawing or publishing conclusions.

Senate-provided HGAB documents · verification and coverage

Senate-provided HGAB documents are being verified. We are checking whether these records match projects currently labeled HGAB-only; potentially most may have supporting documentation. That remains unverified while title matches and document contents are reviewed. This is a gain for transparency. We thank the Senate for providing these records.

No title match is not proof that documents do not exist. The expanded scan reads first-page native PDF text across POW, BP 202, Development Council, geotagged-photo, implementability-certificate and other PDFs. Image-only or damaged files and titles outside the first page may remain unmatched. Source PDF links remain unpublished.

Complete-document coverage. The chart below counts HGAB-only projects with matched-file presence in at least four of the five named document types. Rows with fewer than four types may still have supporting files; this is a completeness threshold, not a no-document finding.

All-document scan: 3,777 of 6,105 HGAB-only rows (61.87%) have at least one matched file; 2,328 (38.13%) have no current match. This covers 19,734 matched file records. By type (project rows overlap): POW 3,620 (59.3%) · BP 202 3,599 (59.0%) · Development Council 1,695 (27.8%) · Geotagged photos 3,194 (52.3%) · Certificate of Implementability 3,574 (58.5%) · Other 2,055 (33.7%). Document presence does not verify file contents.

How Senate document coverage is counted

The expanded scan uses exact or relaxed first-page title matches and unique HGAB-code sibling files. The all-document total deduplicates by House project row; per-type counts overlap. Complete documents means matched-file presence in at least four of five named types: POW, BP 202, Development Council, geotagged photos and Certificate of Implementability; Other is excluded. T5 filename-code inventory shows file presence only. PDF contents and geotagged photo coordinates are not verified; unmatched rows may still have documents.

Senate files · complete HGAB-only document sets

Loading complete-document coverage…

Complete · at least 4 of 5 named typesBelow completeness threshold · may have filesReported Senate/GAB removals · aggregate reference

Complete means matched-file presence in at least four of POW, BP 202, Development Council, geotagged photos and Certificates of Implementability. File presence does not verify document contents.

Other aggregate figures and calculation details

The reported Senate/GAB removal of 295 items totaling ₱8.836B is aggregate-only. The chart overlays this aggregate on the below-threshold project and allocation portions for scale. No individual removed rows are identified, so the overlay does not establish which projects were removed. The former BP 202/POW-only title-match split is retained in source data for reference but is not the headline measure on this page.

All HGAB-only projects · document matches and signatories

One row per HGAB-only project. Proposal links and Senate-provided HGAB files are marked separately. Signatories are document-extracted candidates, not verified current officials or project sponsors. Document presence does not verify contents.

Download all HGAB-only rows as JSON ↗

Search projects or signatories

HGAB code	Project	Office · region	HGAB allocation	Proposal docs	Senate HGAB docs	Signatories in related documents
Loading HGAB-only document coverage…

Rows

Senate-provided HGAB POW documents · parsed results

This parsed-results table is limited to Senate POW files assigned to the HGAB-only project cohort with a Proposal document gap. The broader parser inventory is not included here. Parsed line items are machine-extracted review evidence; verify amounts and descriptions against the source page. PDF links and source paths are not published.

Loading parsed POW results…

HGAB file code	House ledger match	Parse status	Bill item	Quantity	Unit	Amount	Category	POW page
Loading parsed POW results…

Investigation queue

Sort starts with the number of independent review signals, then allocation. Signals are screening leads, not findings. Select a row for the source context and individual methods.

Project / source	Office · region	Program	Allocation	Flags	Repeat evidence	NEP / document route	advance-copy HGAB POW	DEO → LEG crosswalk evidence

Methods and limits

Combined DPWH Transparency source: Online portal links and advance-copy POW documents are treated as one document source. PDF URLs are withheld; uniquely exact-title-matched files count as document evidence.
advance-copy HGAB POW documents: parsed rows are attached only when the normalized full project title in the POW text exactly matches one unique House ledger title. Ambiguous repeated titles and unmatched files are not assigned. PDF links are not published.
Document screen: a document record counts when present directly on the HGAB title match, on the selected NEP counterpart, or as a uniquely exact-title-matched advance-copy POW document. Pairing does not prove the NEP documents have identical scope to the HGAB line.
Red flags and cost clustering: exact HGAB ID join to the existing line-item review queue. This carries its repeated-allocation clusters, high unit-cost signals, historical comparisons and related cautions. Candidate flags need source and scope review.
Repeated projects: within-stage repeat pairs and prior-GAA title candidates are attached where exact HGAB IDs match. Similar titles or costs alone do not prove duplicate scope.
DEO clustering: the review queue's district/representative associations are shown as leads. A DEO may serve multiple legislative districts; the office total is not split or attributed to an individual legislator.
LEG crosswalk: the DEO is joined to spatially intersecting legislative districts using the existing boundary crosswalk. Overlap does not assign a project to a district, member, sponsor or controller; boundary dates are unverified and multi-district DEOs remain shared.
Senate/GAB removal: only the aggregate 295 / ₱8.836B figure is available in the local inputs. Project-level inclusion remains unresolved until the Senate/GAB rows are matched.

Sources: HGAB 3rd-reading DPWH ledger; DPWH Transparency project/document snapshot; selected NEP–HGAB mapping; line-item review queue; within-stage repeat screen; historical GAA repeat screen; DEO–LEG boundary crosswalk. Snapshot: 2026-10-18T08:46:20Z.